|
Real Name: Bj Lewis Gender: male Date of Birth: April 25, 1982 Member Since: September 21, 2007 Last Signed In: October 13, 2008 Profile Views: 2378 Blog Views: 5317 So break out your WTF rally towels for the SIMS movie.... So Diesel could be back in XXX...uh..X... So wait WTF?? Will Smith as Captain America..? So filming has begun on Transformers 2 So...a guitar hero movie?? WTF?? So that movie voiceover guy has died... So again I say, who's ready to go "Fast and Furious"? So there's a movie that will Kick-A**....because it says so... So is Tom "Crazy" Cruise too old for MI:4? So 8 months till bell time?? September 07 October 07 November 07 December 07 January 08 February 08 March 08 April 08 May 08 June 08 July 08 August 08 September 08 October 08
RSS 2.0![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
Talk to me about your feelings on The Golden Compass!
So there has a been a some hoopla over this movie. It's based on the books by Phillip Pullman, a proud atheist. Pullman paints the Catholic church as the enemy in his books and has gone on record saying he wants to turn children away from God. Filmmakers have downplayed that aspect of the books and said they have made adjustments in the big screen version, but that remains to be seen. I am interested in talking to folks for a story who have an opinion either way about the books/movie. I can be reached at 361-580-6535 or bjlewis@vicad.com
20 comments from 9 users
posted by
sandwichh
on Dec 6, 2007 at 11:43 AM
Rebecca, You would see the movie as you have learned to look at things and should be able to tell if it is good or not, real or not. That is what a parent or adult has over a young child, that life time of learning to tell the difference. Like one of my sons was trying to get me to allow him to do something he told me about, acting like nothing was going on. I told him no because there was going to be this and that. He looked carzy at me and asked how did you know. My wife told him because your dad had been there and done or seen that. That is called guiding your children. Again, all I am saying is that when a warning sign is up you do the foot work to make the decision to let your child do something or not. I am not calling anybody a bad parent, just I belief the kids are worth a little effort to help keep them in the road. Let them explore and learn, but help in guiding them.
posted by
Rebecca
on Dec 5, 2007 at 01:48 PM
posted by
ShureleeUJest
on Dec 5, 2007 at 12:34 PM
What's being missed here is, yes, the movie is relatively innocuous and entertaining - that's the point! The concern is that children will be curious about the books and want to read them. The first book, THE GOLDEN COMPASS is basically as innocuous as the film but subtly different. The second and third books, THE SUBTLE KNIFE and THE AMBER SPYGLASS however, get worse and worse. THE AMBER SPYGLASS has children killing God so everyone is free to do anything they want. Throughout the trilogy the theme is that religion (God) is oppressive and evil - an historical claim made by atheists. In an interview, Pullman, an avowed atheist, said he wants to "kill the idea of God in children." The film is an attempt to draw the children in. There are detailed reviews of each book online to check it out as well as interviews with Pullman. People can laugh and claim that this is silly hysteria; all I'm suggesting is that parents spend some time researching the books instead of listening to the Hollywood hype about this "wonderful childrens' film." posted by
maryann
on Dec 5, 2007 at 12:08 PM
Triangle, I'm sure Mr. Pullman KNOWS that not many children are secure in their faith and are very impressionable. posted by
maryann
on Dec 5, 2007 at 12:05 PM
posted by
sandwichh
on Dec 5, 2007 at 10:36 AM
You people take things way out of context. And like was said, it may not be worth the money to take them after you see it. Boy, have we seen so many movies that just are not worth the ticket price nowadays. posted by
Rebecca
on Dec 5, 2007 at 09:50 AM
Before Harry Potter there were warnings against Cabbage Patch dolls, Smurfs, and even home interior. When I was a child, back in the 70s, people decorated their homes in frogs and mushrooms. Remember that? You know, like in the 80s people decorated with paisleys. This decor (frogs and mushrooms) was warned about by a few Christians. I remember as a child I thought these people were crazy. Frogs were considered satanic because the string of logic went something like: frogs come out at night, frogs are creatures of the night, night is dark, dark is satan. I'm serious! When people put these types of issues before relationships and the way they treat and interact with others they are doing more harm than any movie ever could. You and I do more damage to "the church" than any movie ever could. Having experienced these many warnings as a child it makes me more skeptical as an adult. I don't believe everything I hear, in fact, it makes me want to "find out for myself." Maybe this negative publicity is actually clever advertising! I didn't give the movie a thought until all the hoopla. posted by
Triangle
on Dec 5, 2007 at 09:34 AM
This reminds me of the drama surrounding Harry Potter. Remember that? All of our children were going to turn to witchcraft and become magicians. If people are so insecure about their religion, then they should not see the movie. If you are secure in your faith, a movie isn't going to shake it. Besides, from what I've seen of this movie, it's not worth the price anyway. Cool down.
posted by
Rebecca
on Dec 5, 2007 at 09:14 AM
All we know about the movie is the offense that people have taken after hearing that it is anti-Christian. We haven't even seen the movie. The author of the books is an atheist and a rude one at that. That is what people feel so strongly about. I challenge a few brave parents to view the movie together and give Mr. Lewis an interview with their honest intelligent reactions. Would it shake your faith to watch a movie where the ruling bad guys are a corrupt church? Did you really think the church in the movie was your church or Christianity? Would you take your children to see this movie? Were the warnings about the movie accurate? Do you think you would have taken offense to the movie if you were told that the bad church was symbolic of false religion? Also, if these brave parents take their children, maybe Mr. Lewis could interview the children? He could even ask them if they think the bad-guy in the movie was similar to their church. I bet it isn't. ;) posted by
StarDotStar
on Dec 5, 2007 at 07:38 AM
If as a parent someone's been raising ther child under certain beliefs and those beliefs are eradicated by viewing one movie, I'd say that person failed as a parent. Besides, if it wasn't for all of the media hoopla, this movie would have been forgotten within a few months of its release as are most films. And how many children (again, without the aid of the media sensationalism) would be able to pick up on the symbolism in the film and relate it to religion?
posted by
sandwichh
on Dec 4, 2007 at 11:06 PM
If there were problem reviews with a movie or book, I would NEVER, NEVER take my children to experiment if it was good or bad. They are not educated scientist, they are sponges. If I thought that it would be something they might be okay with and all the reviews were a bunch of hoopla then I would take them later because I, the parent, had done my job and run the blocking first. I was not and am not my childrens best friend. I am the father, the parent, and we have a responsiblity to them to act like it. People are so worried about spanking the kids nowadays because it may hurt them physically or make them feel bad that we overlook the mental, upright upbringing we are also responsible for. Whether people will admit it or not, there is good and evil in this world, right and wrong. And if you have been blessed with little ones to raise and get them on the right track in life then I think it is worth that little effort to do that. We should not be lazy in our parenting. posted by
RogerTheShrubber
on Dec 4, 2007 at 10:23 PM
It's a movie. If you don't want to take your kids.....ummm...then don't take your kids. If you don't want to see an "anti Christian" movie....ummmm...then don't go see the movie. Seriously....it's a movie, not a constitutional ammendent. What is this? Russia?
posted by
maryann
on Dec 4, 2007 at 09:45 PM
One more comment- the "Christians" have been asleep and lukewarm in this country for the last generation. Responses in cases like these show that we just lay down and let the godless have their way. They don't even have to TRY to seduce our young, we bring them to them. posted by
maryann
on Dec 4, 2007 at 09:40 PM
I won''t take my children. They are not guinea pigs that I experiment with, then ask them how things went. I'm the adult in the situation, and I don't plan on exposing my kids to an author who hates C.S. Lewis and said that his books are the anti-thesis to these Christian-themed books. My children can certainly think for themselves, but they ARE children. If some show is questionable about sex or violence, I won't let them tell me their review, I'll take care of it beforehand. Religious tomfoolery or mocking God is still my call as a parent. Instead of good winning, evil will win, especially when kids start clamoring for the books behind the movie. Above all, there are enough good movies out there, and I won't contribute to the coffers of this guy. posted by
BillyMau
on Dec 4, 2007 at 09:20 PM
From the AP movie review: Oh yes, and about that tizzy that Pullman's writings are anti-Christian, and that "The Golden Compass" foists atheism on malleable, unsuspecting children — any reference to religion is totally vague and up for interpretation. The evil body trying to manipulate young minds isn't any specific church but rather the broadly imposing Magesterium. Tickle Me Elmo is more subversive. This is pretty much what I'm expecting from this movie. The out and out anti-God stuff that certain groups would protest rarely makes it into a wide theatrical release. Most people go to a movie to be entertain, not informed. That's something like likely bothers people at both ends of this debate. |