Neurognosis
Science in general will be the majority of my work here but much focus will be on neuroscience, psychology, neurobiology, evolutionary biology, and palaeoanthropology. There will also be ample dose of personal adventures and trials posted.
About Crobar


Real Name:
Cory Overby
Member Since:
October 10, 2007
Last Signed In:
October 09, 2008
Profile Views:
481
Blog Views:
1145
View Profile
Send a Message
Send To A Friend
Sign Guestbook
Add as a Friend

Previous Posts
Neurognosis is moving...
Neanderthal mtDNA genome sequenced
Farewell George...
I learned something just now...
Platypus Genome
Wow, so, it's been a busy time...
...it's been a while...
Busy, busy...
Pre-Cambrian Explosion?
Insight into the neurobiology of Boderline Personality Disorder
Archives
October 07
November 07
December 07
January 08
February 08
March 08
April 08
May 08
June 08
July 08
August 08
September 08
October 08
Subscribe!
RSS 2.0 feed RSS 2.0
Add to My Yahoo
Add to My Google
Add to Bloglines
Add to My AOL
Crobar - > Neurognosis -> Chain mails, e-mails, bulletins et cetera...
Chain mails, e-mails, bulletins et cetera...
Like half of the world's population, I have a MySpace account.  On MySpace, your friends can post "bulletins" about whatever they wish to talk about.  Many are "surveys" which people fill out - they answer questions about themselves so that anyone who reads it can know the person better.

Now, another large portion of the total bulletins posted there are chain bulletins.  They take the same form as chain e-mails - "repost this or <insert whatever improbable horrible event you can think of here>".  So people repost this bulletin without hesitation.  The same goes for chain e-mails...but why?

Chain e-mails play on people's superstition and our basic human ability to make causal inferences and connections between events real, perceived and imagined.  The other ingredient is fear.  Just maybe, just maybe if I don't repost this bulletin or send this e-mail to everyone I know my mother will die at midnight!  Is it possible?  In the realm of probability, yes.  Is it likely?  Not at all.  You'd probably be more likely to be hit by lightening, be in a car accident or even hit by a meteor than that event perfect correlating with you not reposting that bulletin or sending that e-mail.

Another aspect at work in this area is something called attributional error.  With the e-mail or bulletin working as something called a "primer" people will be more likely to attribute any "bad" event to their non-compliance of forwarding that e-mail.  It's truly just a common psychological phenomenon and objectively there cannot be shown any link between whatever event might occur and not posting some e-mail.

All it takes is a little high effort thinking, understanding of the psychological principles at work and realizing that you won't have a horrible love life for 10 years if you don't comment on my blog.
Tags: psychology, social psychology, superstition, chain mails, myspace
posted by Crobar on Saturday, December 8, 2007 at 10:57 AM
Report a Violation
Viewed 35 times
2 comments from 2 users

1

posted by CF on Dec 8, 2007 at 01:23 PM
Interesting blog.  I've often pondered the same question myself, especially after seeing someone whom I'd thought "knew better" forward one of these bulletins/emails, LOL.

To continue the discussion: what sort of chain communication did people forward before there were emails and bulletins and other electronic forms of communication?  Was there anything else besides chain letters?  Those required time and effort, and we all know that the vast majority of those ended up in the trash can.  Which leads to the next question: why were they thrown away?  Was it because people 20+ years ago didn't actually believe in them (as opposed to most people now, it seems), or because they were just simply too lazy to go through the effort of forwarding the chain letter?  If the second reason is the answer, then does that mean that most chain emails/bulletins nowadays are forwarded because it's easier to click a few buttons and clog up a friend's inbox than it is to stuff an envelope and make a trip to the post office?

Didn't mean to bombard you with questions there, LOL!  You've brought up a topic of which I've been wondering about for a while.  Every time I get one of those emails or bulletins, I instinctively make a judgement about that person's intelligence level--and it's usually not a good one.  I know, I know.  But seriously.  If Bill Gates isn't going to randomly start passing out money to all Microsoft users, he's SURELY not going to do it if I don't forward this email to everyone I know.

(He especially wouldn't be passing out any free money to me anyway, seeing as how I don't do Windows.  *grin*)
posted by Crobar on Dec 9, 2007 at 05:36 PM
I can't say I know much about the history of chain mails and the like.  However, it would seem that snail mail communications of that type would more likely end up in the trash because of the amount of attention and conscious handling involved.  So, in a way, I do think that being able to simply click a few buttons here and there make it more likely for chain mails in that medium to work.  I actually had a couple of scientific journal articles on chain mails somewhere now that I think about it.  I may have to find those and read over them again.  Although, if I remember correctly the medium of communication plays heavily in whether or not such an item is forwarded or not.
1

Leave a Comment
Ground Rules for posting comments:
  • No profanity or personal attacks.
  • Please comment on the subject of the blog post itself.
If you do not follow these rules we will remove your comment. Please keep it civil.

To protect users from spam, we need you to prove that you're a human being.
Please enter the text from the image at left.