Politcs Plus
I will be writing the 2008 presidential election and anything political in between. Although I am a Democrat ,come on in and tell me where I am wrong. lol
About Mike


Member Since:
October 01, 2007
Last Signed In:
September 06, 2008
Profile Views:
781
Blog Views:
5140
View Profile
Send a Message
Send To A Friend
Sign Guestbook
Add as a Friend

Previous Posts
Why I think Barack Obama will win in November
No longer McCain's party
That was yesterday's qualifications
Grand Slam
"No way,no how,no John McCain"
The Hillary Factor and why
Excellent Choice
Nuance v Steadfast
Start the real campaign
Glad to be back
Archives
October 07
November 07
December 07
January 08
February 08
March 08
April 08
May 08
June 08
July 08
August 08
September 08
John Edwards & Barack Obama went straight for the jugular in going
after Hillary. They attacked the vote on calling the Iranian Revolutionary Council a terrorist organization. Saying it will give this president the excuse he needs to
go to war with Iran.

Hillary’s inconsistent answers were exposed on social security and at the end
of the debate she agreed with New York Gov. Eliot Spitzer's controversial plan to give driver's licenses to illegal immigrants but then a minute later started backtracking.
Now Bill Clinton was a master at being evasive but her facial expressions and
demeanor showed she is no Bill Clinton. Will this debate change the numbers?
I don’t know.

I think what was really exposed last night was status quo positions of the front runner.
How can my party complain about the secrecy in the Bush Administration
if Hillary does not turn over all her documents? I understand it gives the other
candidates an unfair advantage, because she will be the only candidate required to
do this. But if this lack of transparency is going to stop, someone has to take
the lead. The other is lobbyist money; Hillary has out raised all the candidates of
both parties in lobbyist money from Wall Street, defense department, and insurance
and drug companies. Some might see it as success but really it business as usual.
Somehow we must have a leader to take us to public financing because these lobbyist
have too much influence.

I am getting suspicious as to why the Bush Administration is getting their way on the
latest NSA spying bill. Did the telecommunication lobbyist have something to do
with it? I don’t know.

This may sound like a slam on Hillary but it really isn’t, it just exposes some of her
weakness in a primary. Great leaders learn form mistakes and they don’t
usually repeat them. Constructive criticism will only make a person stronger.
Subscribe!
RSS 2.0 feed RSS 2.0
Add to My Yahoo
Add to My Google
Add to Bloglines
Add to My AOL
Mike - > Politcs Plus -> Democratic debate in Vegas- a slugfest ?
Democratic debate in Vegas- a slugfest ?

If you wanted a bout, the first ten minutes or so was devoted to Obama and Edwards taking their best jabs at Hillary. If facial expressions count, then IMO her makeup did crack with all the pressure of her frowns, but, she was well rested and it did not seem to take her off her stride. Obama and Edwards tried to attack Hillary later in the debate but, they were booed which did seem to take the boys off their stride. For the remainder of the date it was about the issues.

Obama really confuses me because he can bring so much excitement and hope at a 10,000 seat fundraiser but in a debate he doesn’t bring that same fire in the belly. An example of that was how he answered the “driver’s license to undocumented immigrants” question. I couldn’t believe it because he answered that question the very same way Hillary fumbled that question two weeks ago.Obama did have a great moment when he challenged Wolf Blitzer for being a pessimist.

John Edwards was my initial favorite because of his populist stance. Edwards is letting the poll numbers drive him away from being the candidate of 2004 when he continued delivering a positive message and being above the fray.

The pundits said Hillary won the debate, in fact the Des Moines Register ran this headline “That’s why the lady is a champ”.

My one big disappointment was Hillary’s response to fixing social security. I turned 62 last Saturday and will be getting my first check in January so now it’s personal.

Anyway her reasoning for not raising the $97,500 FICA payroll amount to say $200,000 ....because it would be raising taxes on the middle class. That’s a GOP answer. A single taxpayer making $200,000 who is properly maxing out his/hers 401K won’t get my tears.

In the end all the candidates want to pull out the troops in Iraq, some sooner than others and all are for appointing Supreme Court judges that would not abolish Roe v Wade.   

 

Tags:
posted by Mike on Friday, November 16, 2007 at 10:16 AM
Report a Violation
Viewed 41 times
0 comments from 0 users

Leave a Comment
Ground Rules for posting comments:
  • No profanity or personal attacks.
  • Please comment on the subject of the blog post itself.
If you do not follow these rules we will remove your comment. Please keep it civil.

To protect users from spam, we need you to prove that you're a human being.
Please enter the text from the image at left.