Politcs Plus
I will be writing the 2008 presidential election and anything political in between. Although I am a Democrat ,come on in and tell me where I am wrong. lol
About Mike


Member Since:
October 01, 2007
Last Signed In:
August 29, 2008
Profile Views:
771
Blog Views:
4912
View Profile
Send a Message
Send To A Friend
Sign Guestbook
Add as a Friend

Previous Posts
Grand Slam
"No way,no how,no John McCain"
The Hillary Factor and why
Excellent Choice
Nuance v Steadfast
Start the real campaign
Glad to be back
Vacation bound....Destination...Chicago
Do negative ads work?
Will be vice presidential choice influence your vote?
Archives
October 07
November 07
December 07
January 08
February 08
March 08
April 08
May 08
June 08
July 08
August 08
John Edwards & Barack Obama went straight for the jugular in going
after Hillary. They attacked the vote on calling the Iranian Revolutionary Council a terrorist organization. Saying it will give this president the excuse he needs to
go to war with Iran.

Hillary’s inconsistent answers were exposed on social security and at the end
of the debate she agreed with New York Gov. Eliot Spitzer's controversial plan to give driver's licenses to illegal immigrants but then a minute later started backtracking.
Now Bill Clinton was a master at being evasive but her facial expressions and
demeanor showed she is no Bill Clinton. Will this debate change the numbers?
I don’t know.

I think what was really exposed last night was status quo positions of the front runner.
How can my party complain about the secrecy in the Bush Administration
if Hillary does not turn over all her documents? I understand it gives the other
candidates an unfair advantage, because she will be the only candidate required to
do this. But if this lack of transparency is going to stop, someone has to take
the lead. The other is lobbyist money; Hillary has out raised all the candidates of
both parties in lobbyist money from Wall Street, defense department, and insurance
and drug companies. Some might see it as success but really it business as usual.
Somehow we must have a leader to take us to public financing because these lobbyist
have too much influence.

I am getting suspicious as to why the Bush Administration is getting their way on the
latest NSA spying bill. Did the telecommunication lobbyist have something to do
with it? I don’t know.

This may sound like a slam on Hillary but it really isn’t, it just exposes some of her
weakness in a primary. Great leaders learn form mistakes and they don’t
usually repeat them. Constructive criticism will only make a person stronger.
Subscribe!
RSS 2.0 feed RSS 2.0
Add to My Yahoo
Add to My Google
Add to Bloglines
Add to My AOL
Mike - > Politcs Plus -> Who are these Independent voters?
Who are these Independent voters?

For the purpose of politics the independent voter do not affiliate with any special party, sometimes they are driven by plain ideology.  Libertarians come to mind.

The independent believe both parties are too partisan and are driven by special interest groups.

The Independent makes up 10% of the electorate but they are coveted by both parties.

The politicos split them into two different categories, Lean and Pure independents.

1.   A pure independent is uninformed, and least politically involved.

2.   The lean independent voter knows the issues, but they tend to vote for just a selected candidate.

 

Every year, we always hear about the increased number of people who call themselves independent voters.  Several books have been written about this voter, but the best I have read is the “The Myth of the Independent voter.” Personally I think these voters just want to stay above the fray so, they call themselves independent.

Party politics is alive and well in America. Follow that independent around and you will find them favoring one side over the other.

According to a recent CBS News poll, 31 percent of voters who described themselves as independent said they intended to vote in a Democratic primary or caucus in their state next year, 19 percent planned to vote in a Republican contest, while the rest said they did not anticipate voting in any nominating election (and in some states, they will be unable to vote if they are not registered in a party).

 

When compared with other independents, those who plan to vote in Democratic primaries next year said they were paying more attention to the campaign and were more enthusiastic about the 2008 election.

The  Independent voters, in the New Hampshire primary will probably determine who the next Democratic or Republican candidates will be. You see, those independent voters can vote in the Democratic or Republican primary so, if Hillary Clinton takes the Iowa primary, Independents will vote in the Republican primary to help elect her opponent.  If Barack Obama wins Iowa, the independent will vote in the Democratic primary for the very same reason.

Got to play nice with those independent voters.  :-)

 

When compared with other independents, those who plan to vote in Democratic primaries next year said they were paying more attention to the campaign and were more enthusiastic about the 2008 election.

 

 

 

 

Tags:
posted by Mike on Friday, November 30, 2007 at 01:24 PM
Report a Violation
Viewed 16 times
0 comments from 0 users

Leave a Comment
Ground Rules for posting comments:
  • No profanity or personal attacks.
  • Please comment on the subject of the blog post itself.
If you do not follow these rules we will remove your comment. Please keep it civil.

To protect users from spam, we need you to prove that you're a human being.
Please enter the text from the image at left.