Politcs Plus
I will be writing the 2008 presidential election and anything political in between. Although I am a Democrat ,come on in and tell me where I am wrong. lol
About Mike


Member Since:
October 01, 2007
Last Signed In:
August 28, 2008
Profile Views:
766
Blog Views:
4879
View Profile
Send a Message
Send To A Friend
Sign Guestbook
Add as a Friend

Previous Posts
"No way,no how,no John McCain"
The Hillary Factor and why
Excellent Choice
Nuance v Steadfast
Start the real campaign
Glad to be back
Vacation bound....Destination...Chicago
Do negative ads work?
Will be vice presidential choice influence your vote?
Scott McClellan outs Fox News
Archives
October 07
November 07
December 07
January 08
February 08
March 08
April 08
May 08
June 08
July 08
August 08
John Edwards & Barack Obama went straight for the jugular in going
after Hillary. They attacked the vote on calling the Iranian Revolutionary Council a terrorist organization. Saying it will give this president the excuse he needs to
go to war with Iran.

Hillary’s inconsistent answers were exposed on social security and at the end
of the debate she agreed with New York Gov. Eliot Spitzer's controversial plan to give driver's licenses to illegal immigrants but then a minute later started backtracking.
Now Bill Clinton was a master at being evasive but her facial expressions and
demeanor showed she is no Bill Clinton. Will this debate change the numbers?
I don’t know.

I think what was really exposed last night was status quo positions of the front runner.
How can my party complain about the secrecy in the Bush Administration
if Hillary does not turn over all her documents? I understand it gives the other
candidates an unfair advantage, because she will be the only candidate required to
do this. But if this lack of transparency is going to stop, someone has to take
the lead. The other is lobbyist money; Hillary has out raised all the candidates of
both parties in lobbyist money from Wall Street, defense department, and insurance
and drug companies. Some might see it as success but really it business as usual.
Somehow we must have a leader to take us to public financing because these lobbyist
have too much influence.

I am getting suspicious as to why the Bush Administration is getting their way on the
latest NSA spying bill. Did the telecommunication lobbyist have something to do
with it? I don’t know.

This may sound like a slam on Hillary but it really isn’t, it just exposes some of her
weakness in a primary. Great leaders learn form mistakes and they don’t
usually repeat them. Constructive criticism will only make a person stronger.
Subscribe!
RSS 2.0 feed RSS 2.0
Add to My Yahoo
Add to My Google
Add to Bloglines
Add to My AOL
Mike - > Politcs Plus -> Lets get back to the important issues,please.
Lets get back to the important issues,please.

This morning, I tuned in to MSNBC’s "Morning Joe" for a recap of the week-end news.

The network was all over the Jeremiah Wright appearance at the NAACP convention in Detroit last night ,and his upcoming appearance in Washington. It was all about, “Why now?”

 

I say, why not? Jeremiah Wright has just as much right to gain fame ,fortune and redemption using politics as Reverend Billy Graham, Falwell and Pat Robertson did.  Jeremiah Wright has a book coming out in about a month, so he will make many appearances, as did the above-mentioned clergyman.Barack Obama has already denounced the controversial statements of his former pastor, so there is no more he can do.Barack Obama told Chris Wallace that the issue of his pastors words are fair game.This only goes to prove that Barack Obama and Jeremiah Wright are not joined at the hip. For Jeremiah Wright to go in isolation, until after the election would be dishonest and deceiving.  If voters think that Barrack Obama will instill an agenda of racial division, then they should not vote for him. I have yet to see any evidence of that.

 

To borrow a line from Jeremiah Wright "...I served six years in the military, does that make me patriotic? How many years did (Vice President Dick) Cheney serve?"  I would've taken it a step or two more by saying "I do not condone torture, nor did I bypass the Constitution by monitoring American citizens without a warrant, or FISA court approval.” When did we stop taking the totality of the person into consideration?

I am sure the George W. Bush and Cheney supporters, have taken their redeeming factors into consideration.

 

So can we let Hillary Clinton stay in the race until she runs out of money, stop worrying about the flag pins, Jeremiah Wright, or if John McCain benefited by using his wife corporate jet for campaign trips?

 

Tags:
posted by Mike on Monday, April 28, 2008 at 03:37 PM
Report a Violation
Viewed 65 times
3 comments from 2 users

1

posted by Mike on Apr 28, 2008 at 04:56 PM

Yes,maryann opinions vary ,but 81% think this country is going in the wrong direction.  So the important issues.  I'm talking about, reflect this number. Economics,Iraq, Social Security ,and health care are pretty high up on this list.

Like I said, unless a potential voter thinks that Barack Obama is going to adopt a racist agenda, his pastor's views should not be that important. IMO..... again take the totality of both persons , if that issue is really important to you. You do yourself a favor,but I agree on the lack of judgment angle.

Likely scenario Maryann..... Michelle Obama, probably chose this church and is probably more in tune with its teachings...I think the wife has the most influence.,when it comes time to pick a church and religion.... No stats or data to back this up,but he may just be a passive member in that church.. Not an excuse but just a thought.

posted by Mike on Apr 28, 2008 at 04:41 PM

I agree with a lot of your points John,but I don't really worry about the GOP ,because their numbers are dropping  and the new Democratic voters  are away up. I think Barack Obama will be able to sway more independent voters that John McCain or Hillary Clinton.

This country is long overdue a discussion on race. Why? Because no one wants to hear the struggles of the 1950s, instead, they want to start in the1990s..... I can understand the anger over reverse discrimination policies that we have in place today, but legislators are scared to reverse them. Perhaps it's time to do away with affirmative action, but first we must make it known that that program was a necessity at one time ,in order to level the playing field. I just had a person tell me today (38 years old) he didn't  know things of the nature that Jeremiah Wright was talking about, actually took place.  When we have the discussion., It must be civil without using in-your-face tactics.

posted by maryann on Apr 28, 2008 at 04:32 PM

Mike, I think the key word is "important" issue. What's important is an opinion, and people's opinions vary

John thinks that the pastor should keep talking.  I do to, but for different reasons, as I am not a Hillary supporter. Maybe this thing will run its course, but J. Wright has a way with words, and that "way" doesn't always help Obama.

As a voter, I think it is important to look into those who help form our potential president's worldview. If this man brought Obama to Christianity, he was an influence on him to one degree or another.

1

Leave a Comment
Ground Rules for posting comments:
  • No profanity or personal attacks.
  • Please comment on the subject of the blog post itself.
If you do not follow these rules we will remove your comment. Please keep it civil.

To protect users from spam, we need you to prove that you're a human being.
Please enter the text from the image at left.