Politcs Plus
I will be writing the 2008 presidential election and anything political in between. Although I am a Democrat ,come on in and tell me where I am wrong. lol
About Mike


Member Since:
October 01, 2007
Last Signed In:
October 15, 2008
Profile Views:
859
Blog Views:
6300
View Profile
Send a Message
Send To A Friend
Sign Guestbook
Add as a Friend

Previous Posts
Barack Obama's new rescue plan
Don't panic....Yet
'Obama has waged the waged the dirtiest campaign in American history.
"That one"
Ask Obama & McCain these questions tonight
Ther're Back: Ayers,Wright, and Rezko
The House needs to step up to the plate.
Where are the leaders?
Time out?
It's about time
Archives
October 07
November 07
December 07
January 08
February 08
March 08
April 08
May 08
June 08
July 08
August 08
September 08
October 08
John Edwards & Barack Obama went straight for the jugular in going
after Hillary. They attacked the vote on calling the Iranian Revolutionary Council a terrorist organization. Saying it will give this president the excuse he needs to
go to war with Iran.

Hillary’s inconsistent answers were exposed on social security and at the end
of the debate she agreed with New York Gov. Eliot Spitzer's controversial plan to give driver's licenses to illegal immigrants but then a minute later started backtracking.
Now Bill Clinton was a master at being evasive but her facial expressions and
demeanor showed she is no Bill Clinton. Will this debate change the numbers?
I don’t know.

I think what was really exposed last night was status quo positions of the front runner.
How can my party complain about the secrecy in the Bush Administration
if Hillary does not turn over all her documents? I understand it gives the other
candidates an unfair advantage, because she will be the only candidate required to
do this. But if this lack of transparency is going to stop, someone has to take
the lead. The other is lobbyist money; Hillary has out raised all the candidates of
both parties in lobbyist money from Wall Street, defense department, and insurance
and drug companies. Some might see it as success but really it business as usual.
Somehow we must have a leader to take us to public financing because these lobbyist
have too much influence.

I am getting suspicious as to why the Bush Administration is getting their way on the
latest NSA spying bill. Did the telecommunication lobbyist have something to do
with it? I don’t know.

This may sound like a slam on Hillary but it really isn’t, it just exposes some of her
weakness in a primary. Great leaders learn form mistakes and they don’t
usually repeat them. Constructive criticism will only make a person stronger.
Subscribe!
RSS 2.0 feed RSS 2.0
Add to My Yahoo
Add to My Google
Add to Bloglines
Add to My AOL
Mike - > Politcs Plus -> What a differance a week makes
What a differance a week makes

According to a recent Washington Post poll  75% of  American voters believe that John McCain would be a good commander in chief, while only 45% believed Barack Obama would be.  That same poll revealed that by a 30% margin that Barack Obama is better suited to restore our relations with our European allies. The Obama camp knew three term senator, with no military experience, would not win the foreign-policy issue with the decorated military experienced Senator Jon McCain. I am not so sure that is a given.

Out of nowhere, Iraq's Prime Minister Maliki said Obama’s 16 month timeline was reasonable plus or minus a few months, according to a German magazine.  The Bush administration went into a full disclaimer mode, saying the prime minister was misquoted.  The New York Times printed the exact quote, showing Maliki was not misquoted.  Another news organization showed a clip with the Maliki translator repeating the timeline quote.  The Bush administration countered with a “general time horizon.” Translation: Time line spelled differently, leaving John McCain out in the cold, with his long-term commitment.  Andrea Mitchell of NBC news is reporting that General Petraeus and Barack Obama (or someone from his delegation) having a shouting match on the timeline issue.  To be continued.

The McCain camp first urged and goaded Obama to go to Iraq, but John McCain wanted to be to be the tour guide.  Obama politely declined, because he wanted Senator Jack Reed and Chuck Hagel to be his advisers on this trip.  So far this trip has backfired for John McCain, because he was greeted warmly by the military and the unexpected gifts by the Iraqi prime minister and the Bush administration.

 

The media have given the foreign-policy guru award to John McCain, because he's had so many trips overseas, and has voted on so many foreign-policy matters. I'll accept that, but I would offer sports analogy to describe my skepticism.  Sometimes that 48th round draft pick will beat out that all-American higher-priced first-round pick, when they are put on the same field, with nothing but talent separating them.  It was not Obama who recently said Iraq borders Pakistan, It was not Obama who confused the Sunni and Shia, or that thinks Czechoslovakia is still a country.

 

Those on the right like to call Barack Obama a naïve idealist when it comes to foreign policy, but it was Obama who put the importance of Afghanistan and Al Qaeda in Pakistan over year ago? It was not John McCain. The McCain followers like to say that Obama’s recent trip to Iraq would not have been possible if it not for John McCain’s surge.  They are quick to point out that Obama voted against the surge.  Barack Obama voted against escalation of the war, and he had the judgment against this war in the first place.  He voted against more money and more lives being lost in this mission.  The surge did help bring down the violence in Baghdad but so did a lot of other factors.

 

1) The 2006 elections allowed George Bush to throw Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld under the bus.

2) The administration's back was against the wall, and had to change course.

3) Iraqi Shi'ite leader Sayed Moqtada al-Sadar exited to Iran as US troops started coming in.

4) Ethnic cleansing caused over 2 million Iraqis to flee the country.

5) The Iraqi Sunnis finally woke up to the fact that Al Qaeda was not their friend.

 

Barack Obama may just be that true realist when it comes to foreign policy.

 

 

Tags:
posted by Mike on Tuesday, July 22, 2008 at 12:25 PM
Report a Violation
Viewed 43 times
2 comments from 2 users

1

posted by Mike on Jul 22, 2008 at 05:02 PM
LOL.....Seriously as much as I hate to dwell in rumors , I think McCain may be suffering from PTSD ,because I remember the press didn't  get much access to medical records..What was it one hour or three, but no camera or  tape recorders etc...... Being imprisoned for five years has to have some effect,but I guess it's not PC to ask.....It's asking the voters to trust his medical report as presented, hoping the doctors are not holding back critical information....I don't have to keep up with all his mistakes ,because others will.
posted by VietnamVet on Jul 22, 2008 at 04:45 PM

Iraq borders Pakistan like Canada borders Mexico.  All these gaffes are being forgiven as, "That's John being John" or "Senior moments".   Anyone who keeps making the same gaffes over and over again may have the big "A" or "D" disease.  They probably aren't brain f**ts like some people may think.  Remember what happened to Raygun in his 2nd term?

Here's a good one:

Senator Barack Obama  pointed out to Senator John McCain that terrorism was a global problem, noting that 3 Brazilian soldiers had been killed by terrorists in the previous week. "That's terrible," a startled John McCain stammered in reply. "How many is a Brazilian?"

1

Leave a Comment
Ground Rules for posting comments:
  • No profanity or personal attacks.
  • Please comment on the subject of the blog post itself.
If you do not follow these rules we will remove your comment. Please keep it civil.

To protect users from spam, we need you to prove that you're a human being.
Please enter the text from the image at left.