About marksremarks


Real Name:
Roy Mark
Member Since:
January 21, 2008
Last Signed In:
September 21, 2008
Profile Views:
194
Blog Views:
1360
View Profile
Send a Message
Send To A Friend
Sign Guestbook
Add as a Friend

Previous Posts
Poll: Racial misgivings of whites an Obama issue
Gov Palin approval 53% and rising Media approval knee high papa and falling
Clinton Administration cost us billions in lost offshore royalties
Biden's mythical blue collar roots
Come out, come out whoever you are
SAME OL SAME OH
YOU MAY BE A LIBERAL IF
WILL THE ADVOCATE EVEN ADMIT IT HAPPENED?
THE SKY'S NOT FALLING THE SKY'S NOT FALLIN G
Hurricane study puts less blame on global warming
Archives
April 08
May 08
June 08
July 08
August 08
September 08
October 08
November 08
December 08
Subscribe!
RSS 2.0 feed RSS 2.0
Add to My Yahoo
Add to My Google
Add to Bloglines
Add to My AOL
marksremarks - > Roy Mark Blog -> Hard days for inerrancy of Democrat party believers
Hard days for inerrancy of Democrat party believers

 

 

These must be terrible times for the biased Democrats on here. They have a messanic belief in the complete inerrancy of the Democrat party. All Democrats are good honest people. Any information that portrays them as any other ways are lie or plots by the vast right wing conspiracy. Now they are seeing two of the icons of the party insulting each other in a good old fashioned smackoff. When Hillary insults Barack and vice versa what are they going to believe? They have to admit that at least one Democrat is wrong. If they do their whole value system is endangered. NO DEMOCRAT IS EVER WRONG. We all know there are some on here who have never admitted that any Democrat ever took money from a lobbyist, never flip flopped on a vote, never commited adultry, never lied before a Federal District Court. As far as they are concerned NEVER HAPPENED

Tags:
posted by marksremarks on Monday, April 21, 2008 at 09:04 PM
Report a Violation
Viewed 23 times
3 comments from 2 users

1

posted by pilot on Apr 22, 2008 at 09:20 AM
nah, nothing gender specific implied by ragging......just verbal assault, torture, etc. now maybe if I had insinuated something about gagging.......... I really don't have any big issues with Clinton, save for his wife. As far as the race goes, McCain could push in the clutch and put it in neutral and coast to the finish line, unless he is swept up in the rising swell of voter apathy that is almost inevitable in this "cliffhanger"
posted by marksremarks on Apr 22, 2008 at 08:36 AM
Mike I don't think my last posting showed any real "ragging" on the Democrat candidates just on the true "Inerrancy"believers down in the grunt ranks.  Incidently Pres Clinton was not impeached  for the DNA  incident. I think it was obstruction of justice etc for the attempted "cover up"  Too little too late to cover that up. Bill just forgot his Arkansas raising on that one. A true Arkie redneck knows that a girl may be willing to do a lot of things but DON'T GET ANYTHING ON HER DRESS. You used the word "ragging" . What image is that supposed to bring up? Male or Female thing?
posted by pilot on Apr 22, 2008 at 06:55 AM
Ooooookay, you've doled out a good ol' whuppin' to the Dems......Hmmmm, it is my contention, that if you leave the word "biased" in the opening statement, you could have used Republicans, televangelists, priests, lawyers, federal judges, cops, Aggies, corporate executives.....well, you see where I'm coming from don't you? True enough, the Republicans seem to be getting caught with their hands in the till/cookie jar, or assuming a wide stance in public men's rooms or waving their weiners indiscriminately, seemingly at random of late. However, I think when you really look closer, at the other party, you will find that they have taken their lumps in the news on a regular basis too. Why you have only to look at the last Democratic President for a good example of that. I mean the guy was impeached for giving a DNA shower to his intern........he sat and was grilled by a congressional committee for that little transgression. And then there was Whitewater. Nah, I think it's pretty even Steven on the bad press........If you want to really rag on the Dems, just point out the two candidates they are offering up as their "best" horses in the race. A skinny no name black kid with an Ipana smile, and a big mouth and no experience to back it up, and the former first ball buster who will ultimately only be remembered for the fact that she drove Slick Willie to attain fame as the first U.S. president ever required to give congress a DNA sample to be matched with the evidence he sprayed on an underling.
1

Leave a Comment
Ground Rules for posting comments:
  • No profanity or personal attacks.
  • Please comment on the subject of the blog post itself.
If you do not follow these rules we will remove your comment. Please keep it civil.

To protect users from spam, we need you to prove that you're a human being.
Please enter the text from the image at left.