Helpful government
Government from local to national is deciding what is "best" for us. California wants to put remote control thermostats in homes because the government knows best. California has decided that children cannot be home schooled unless the parent has a teaching certificate because the government knows best. Mississippi has a bill pending in the legislature that fat people (as defined by the state) cannot be served in restaurants because the government knows best. Texas tells people they cannot play eight liner machines that pay out too much because the government knows best. The United States government tells us what time it is because the government knows best. I'm tired of the government telling me what is best. I want to return to the days when I was allowed to decide for myself what is best.
About thewaywardwind


Gender:
male
Date of Birth:
April 17, 1948
Member Since:
March 10, 2008
Last Signed In:
December 03, 2008
Profile Views:
228
Blog Views:
2618
View Profile
Send a Message
Send To A Friend
Sign Guestbook
Add as a Friend

Previous Posts
Twenty thousand soldiers for domestic defense
Pirates -- and not from Pittsburgh
The latest assault on the First Amendment
The Advocate should report...
Obama supporters want change? Here it is. Enjoy!
Advocate comics
I think Obama will win
After all these years, we find the Constitution is flawed
Obama takes a page from Karl Marx
Not that Victoria needs defending, but...
Archives
March 08
April 08
May 08
June 08
July 08
August 08
September 08
October 08
November 08
December 08
Subscribe!
RSS 2.0 feed RSS 2.0
Add to My Yahoo
Add to My Google
Add to Bloglines
Add to My AOL
thewaywardwind - > Helpful government -> $48 billion boondoggle
$48 billion boondoggle
Congress has passed and President Bush says he'll sign a bill authorizing $48 billion for AIDS relief and the lifting of the ban of foreigners traveling into the U.S. who have HIV/AIDS.  That $48 billion is a lot of money and could do a  lot of good here at home for American citizens who don't have health insurance.  I'm not real thrilled with lifting the ban on travel into the country by people who have AIDS.   I am afraid that many will end up in the health care system here, rather than back home.  I tell you, seems like every time I hear a story that has Bush's name in it, I look more forward to the day he leaves office.  I admit I voted for him, and considering the choices I had, might still vote for him given the same circumstances.  But, he has turned out to be the biggest dissappointment I have ever seen in a public official.  January can't get here fast enough to suit me. 
Tags: AIDS relief, travel restrictions lifted.
posted by thewaywardwind on Wednesday, July 30, 2008 at 12:17 PM
Report a Violation
Viewed 24 times
2 comments from 2 users

1

posted by freethinker on Aug 1, 2008 at 10:19 AM
Well I agree with your last two sentences too but not with the rest of your blog. People who are hiv positive should be allowed to visit the United States. American citizens with hiv can travel abroad. This will just be lifting the ban in place since 1987 when the Reagan administration put it into effect. And we know all the great things Reagan did to help the spread of aids. Not much at all. How long did it even take him before he would mention the word. Boy, I could go on about Reagan but I won't. Getting back to the 48 billion, although this sounds like a lot of money it is just a drop in the bucket in fighting the aids epidemic around the world. Also these funds are not just for Aids, but also Malaria and Tuberculosis which both kill millions of people every year. The funds from this bill will be directed at sub-saharan Africa,Vietnam, Haiti, and Guyana, where Aids, malaria and tuberculosis outbreaks are concentrated. The bill is not perfect by any means though. For one thing it does not explicitly encourage the close integration of HIV programs with family planning and other reproductive health services. Recently former US President Bill Clinton announced a deal between a foundation he runs and Chinese and Indian companies to reduce the price of a key malaria drug by one-third. Good for him!
posted by pilot on Jul 30, 2008 at 01:01 PM
Well put. I don't think I could have Voiced the sentiment in your last two sentences myself, without being bleeped out a couple of times though.......
1

Leave a Comment
Ground Rules for posting comments:
  • No profanity or personal attacks.
  • Please comment on the subject of the blog post itself.
If you do not follow these rules we will remove your comment. Please keep it civil.

To protect users from spam, we need you to prove that you're a human being.
Please enter the text from the image at left.