<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#">
    <channel>
        <title>How do you keep track of all the accusations? - Your Advocate: an editor&#039;s blog - ChrisCobler&apos;s Blog - Victoria Advocate</title>
        <link>http://community.victoriaadvocate.com/home/Blog/ChrisCobler/7799</link>
        <description>Two or three weeks ago, Scott Hanson hung up on me after I became exasperated by his criticism that the Advocate wasn&#039;t digging hard enough into Victoria District Attorney Stephen Tyler. We&#039;re doing all we can, I told Hanson, also known as Sailor on our discussion forums.

Then Thursday night, Public Service Editor Gabe Semenza called me right before the start of the Bach Festival performance to tell me Tyler had accused the Advocate of helping to write the recall petition. As I said in today&#039;s story, that&#039;s outrageously false. I left a message with the district attorney this morning to ask why he would make such a ridiculous accusation without a shred of evidence.

You might say the newspaper is under attack from both sides. I see this as evidence that we&#039;re being fair. We will continue to do so.

It&#039;s up to the public and a judge to decide whether there&#039;s merit to the group&#039;s recall petition. We haven&#039;t posted the petition yet because Hanson did not provide it to us Thursday. We&#039;re still working to get it this morning from the courthouse.

I certainly understand why people might be confused by the entire mess. You have to be following closely the twists and turns of this saga. Even then, we still don&#039;t know all of the facts surrounding the investigation into Michael Ratcliff, the DA&#039;s former chief of staff and a former sheriff. We&#039;re working to post all of our coverage under special reports to help you digest it. We&#039;re not finished re-posting and organizing the dozens of articles we&#039;ve published on the subject in the past year, but librarian Robbi Patterson is working hard on this.

If you&#039;d like to know anything else about the Advocate&#039;s coverage, please let us know. My direct number is 361-574-1271.</description>
        <itunes:summary>Two or three weeks ago, Scott Hanson hung up on me after I became exasperated by his criticism that the Advocate wasn&#039;t digging hard enough into Victoria District Attorney Stephen Tyler. We&#039;re doing all we can, I told Hanson, also known as Sailor on our discussion forums.

Then Thursday night, Public Service Editor Gabe Semenza called me right before the start of the Bach Festival performance to tell me Tyler had accused the Advocate of helping to write the recall petition. As I said in today&#039;s story, that&#039;s outrageously false. I left a message with the district attorney this morning to ask why he would make such a ridiculous accusation without a shred of evidence.

You might say the newspaper is under attack from both sides. I see this as evidence that we&#039;re being fair. We will continue to do so.

It&#039;s up to the public and a judge to decide whether there&#039;s merit to the group&#039;s recall petition. We haven&#039;t posted the petition yet because Hanson did not provide it to us Thursday. We&#039;re still working to get it this morning from the courthouse.

I certainly understand why people might be confused by the entire mess. You have to be following closely the twists and turns of this saga. Even then, we still don&#039;t know all of the facts surrounding the investigation into Michael Ratcliff, the DA&#039;s former chief of staff and a former sheriff. We&#039;re working to post all of our coverage under special reports to help you digest it. We&#039;re not finished re-posting and organizing the dozens of articles we&#039;ve published on the subject in the past year, but librarian Robbi Patterson is working hard on this.

If you&#039;d like to know anything else about the Advocate&#039;s coverage, please let us know. My direct number is 361-574-1271.</itunes:summary>
        <language>en-us</language>

                
                    <item>
                <title>Jun 20,  2008 at 10:06 AM : I&#039;m afraid you...</title>
                <description>I&#039;m afraid you guys had this coming when you took ANY side in this fiasco. Editorials, when labeled as such, should be&amp;nbsp; welcome by the public. But the declaration that the DA was wrong minded in the indictment of City officials has drawn a line in the sand. Again, the newspaper has a role in the community. I suppose your past and future reporting will determine that role.
Interesting that both sides seem to think the VicAd are against them and contributing to the opposing side. Could it be that both sides are overly defensive? Again, understandable given the nature of various charges, and the size of our community.
Unfortunately, the false accusations and &amp;quot;behind closed door meetings&amp;quot; are only adding to the general publics confusion. And in turn, our paranoia.
One conclusion? SEND THE WHOLE BUNCH BACK HOME AT ELECTION TIME!!!. My God, third graders would exhibit more common sense and self control than our &amp;quot;leaders&amp;quot;.
Chris, I can understand how it would be horribly difficult to be objective when hit the &amp;quot;hang-ups&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;late night&amp;quot; phone calls from both sides. Try to stay above the fray.</description>
                <link>http://community.victoriaadvocate.com/home/Blog/ChrisCobler/7799/#c_54497</link>
                <guid>http://community.victoriaadvocate.com/home/Blog/ChrisCobler/7799/#c_54497</guid>
                <itunes:summary>I&#039;m afraid you guys had this coming when you took ANY side in this fiasco. Editorials, when labeled as such, should be&amp;nbsp; welcome by the public. But the declaration that the DA was wrong minded in the indictment of City officials has drawn a line in the sand. Again, the newspaper has a role in the community. I suppose your past and future reporting will determine that role.
Interesting that both sides seem to think the VicAd are against them and contributing to the opposing side. Could it be that both sides are overly defensive? Again, understandable given the nature of various charges, and the size of our community.
Unfortunately, the false accusations and &amp;quot;behind closed door meetings&amp;quot; are only adding to the general publics confusion. And in turn, our paranoia.
One conclusion? SEND THE WHOLE BUNCH BACK HOME AT ELECTION TIME!!!. My God, third graders would exhibit more common sense and self control than our &amp;quot;leaders&amp;quot;.
Chris, I can understand how it would be horribly difficult to be objective when hit the &amp;quot;hang-ups&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;late night&amp;quot; phone calls from both sides. Try to stay above the fray.</itunes:summary>     
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>Jun 20,  2008 at 10:06 AM : I agree, vote them ALL...</title>
                <description>I agree, vote them ALL out: sheriff, city council, mayor, DA </description>
                <link>http://community.victoriaadvocate.com/home/Blog/ChrisCobler/7799/#c_54500</link>
                <guid>http://community.victoriaadvocate.com/home/Blog/ChrisCobler/7799/#c_54500</guid>
                <itunes:summary>I agree, vote them ALL out: sheriff, city council, mayor, DA </itunes:summary>     
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>Jun 20,  2008 at 02:06 PM : Luminary,...</title>
                <description>Luminary,

We&#039;ll watch out for the zealots, vigilantes, demons and mad dogs. Every source has an agenda. That doesn&#039;t mean their concerns shouldn&#039;t be heard and investigated. That&#039;s what a newspaper does.

Robert, 

I hear you about voting them all out of office. I might have voted with you last night when Gabe called me, but that seems a bit rash upon reflection. In my experience, most locally elected officials are good people. The exceptions shouldn&#039;t overshadow the rule.

Bighorn,

Good advice to try to stay about the fray. We&#039;ll keep trying.
</description>
                <link>http://community.victoriaadvocate.com/home/Blog/ChrisCobler/7799/#c_54556</link>
                <guid>http://community.victoriaadvocate.com/home/Blog/ChrisCobler/7799/#c_54556</guid>
                <itunes:summary>Luminary,

We&#039;ll watch out for the zealots, vigilantes, demons and mad dogs. Every source has an agenda. That doesn&#039;t mean their concerns shouldn&#039;t be heard and investigated. That&#039;s what a newspaper does.

Robert, 

I hear you about voting them all out of office. I might have voted with you last night when Gabe called me, but that seems a bit rash upon reflection. In my experience, most locally elected officials are good people. The exceptions shouldn&#039;t overshadow the rule.

Bighorn,

Good advice to try to stay about the fray. We&#039;ll keep trying.
</itunes:summary>     
            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>Jun 21,  2008 at 01:06 AM : The fact that both...</title>
                <description>The fact that both sides are attacking The Advocate proves one thing: you must be doing a heck of a job!</description>
                <link>http://community.victoriaadvocate.com/home/Blog/ChrisCobler/7799/#c_54642</link>
                <guid>http://community.victoriaadvocate.com/home/Blog/ChrisCobler/7799/#c_54642</guid>
                <itunes:summary>The fact that both sides are attacking The Advocate proves one thing: you must be doing a heck of a job!</itunes:summary>     
            </item>
            </channel>
</rss>