http://community.victoriaadvocate.com/home/Blog/marksremarks/7157 Most Evangelical Christians believe that if one iota of the Bible is wrong, then the entire Bible could be wrong. The Bible is their absolute. The need for an absolute is not limited to religion – at least religion in the theocratic sense. Liberals, too, have a religion, but a secular one: their faith in and fealty to the Democrat party There is a special quality to their posts, if you will notice...There is evidence of a determination to parrot certain erratic and unsupportable theories and talking points, which are easily disproved. The history for both of them however, indicates that becoming knowledgeable about a subject is not their goal, thus, the same mistakes in comprehension and presentation are made endlessly. They both display a kind of frenzied eagerness to make unsupportable accusations, with a manner that shows a certain urgency to state their opinion. Equally as evident, is the fact that neither is willing to consider any in depth analysis of their subject matter. It appears both are simply reading from a script, and expect everyone else to accept any bizarre and outlandish assertion they make.When the same people perform the same way, day in and day out, to their own detriment, you have to understand there is a larger agenda at stake for them. The belief system has been accepted as being more important than fact. Questioning the facts, and conducting research, generates information eventually. Their predisposition is to reject any fact that conflicts with what they choose to believe. Their entire world view is structured on unquestioned acceptance of several unsupportable assertions about the world which are easily shown to be in error. The ramifications of having to accept factual reality are so threatening as to be strenuously resisted at every encounter Roy Mark signed as always Most Evangelical Christians believe that if one iota of the Bible is wrong, then the entire Bible could be wrong. The Bible is their absolute. The need for an absolute is not limited to religion – at least religion in the theocratic sense. Liberals, too, have a religion, but a secular one: their faith in and fealty to the Democrat party There is a special quality to their posts, if you will notice...There is evidence of a determination to parrot certain erratic and unsupportable theories and talking points, which are easily disproved. The history for both of them however, indicates that becoming knowledgeable about a subject is not their goal, thus, the same mistakes in comprehension and presentation are made endlessly. They both display a kind of frenzied eagerness to make unsupportable accusations, with a manner that shows a certain urgency to state their opinion. Equally as evident, is the fact that neither is willing to consider any in depth analysis of their subject matter. It appears both are simply reading from a script, and expect everyone else to accept any bizarre and outlandish assertion they make.When the same people perform the same way, day in and day out, to their own detriment, you have to understand there is a larger agenda at stake for them. The belief system has been accepted as being more important than fact. Questioning the facts, and conducting research, generates information eventually. Their predisposition is to reject any fact that conflicts with what they choose to believe. Their entire world view is structured on unquestioned acceptance of several unsupportable assertions about the world which are easily shown to be in error. The ramifications of having to accept factual reality are so threatening as to be strenuously resisted at every encounter Roy Mark signed as always en-us Are you talking about Democrats or the current administration? http://community.victoriaadvocate.com/home/Blog/marksremarks/7157/#c_45911 http://community.victoriaadvocate.com/home/Blog/marksremarks/7157/#c_45911 Are you talking about Democrats or the current administration? Roy Mark says R the S I will not insult your intelligence by asking if the question you ask is serious.  I stated very plainly that I was writing of the true blue "Democrats" who boast that they always blindly and zombie like good little sheep always pull the straight Democrat lever. They must be a little confused now with the two Democrat candidates who must both be considered correct because they are  Democrats playing the dozens with each other. Hillary asked Obama about being cozy with an actual bomb throwing terrorist. His reply was President Clinton pardoned two of them.  So now we know that both Democrat candidates have the bomb throwing terrorist support.This fall when the democratic bloodletting is finally (temporarily) over all we have to is run the film clips during thier campaigns. That way the 'Republican hate machine' and the 'Vast right wing conspiracy' can sit this one out because we knuckle draggers won't need them. The so call debate did confirm one thing that I and others have always thought that George Steph was a Clinton stooge. They gave him his start in politics. Now the Obamoids are saying the same thing.  I call 'em Obamoids, those True Believers in the Word according to Obama. Void of thought, they will bask in his Words without examining what, if anything, Obama is actually saying. That's why Obama will get away with "clarifying" his recent statements. At least among the Obamoids It is troublesome that so many became Obama's True Believers before checking his actual view on life and politics...explains how demogogues get away with their crimes for so long (and sometimes too late) before they wake up. This is typical thinking of the Straight Democrat voting always faithfull. Most liberals are simply "admitting" what despicable people the Clintons are now that they have some other person to latch onto-Obama. It is fun to watch the liberals validate everything we've known and said about the Clintons, though they would never admit we were right all along. Liberals claim to be the smartest people in the room but have been willing to have their intelligence insulted continuously by the Clintons. Having to swallow that the Clintons have a real marriage. Having to swallow that it was simply a VRWC bringing up false stories like Monica-swallow pun unintended! Having to swallow that Monica was a one time transgression in the White House and that there were no other victims. And liberals poke fun at the blind faith displayed by the religious-WOW! .TRIPLE CROWN WINNER I wouldn't vote for Hillary. To a liberal that makes me a a mysogynist. I wouldn't vote for Obama. To a liberal that makes me a racist. Oh yeah, I wouldn't vote for Barney Frank. To a liberal that makes me a homophobe. I win the trifecta Roy Mark     http://community.victoriaadvocate.com/home/Blog/marksremarks/7157/#c_45934 http://community.victoriaadvocate.com/home/Blog/marksremarks/7157/#c_45934 Roy Mark says R the S I will not insult your intelligence by asking if the question you ask is serious.  I stated very plainly that I was writing of the true blue "Democrats" who boast that they always blindly and zombie like good little sheep always pull the straight Democrat lever. They must be a little confused now with the two Democrat candidates who must both be considered correct because they are  Democrats playing the dozens with each other. Hillary asked Obama about being cozy with an actual bomb throwing terrorist. His reply was President Clinton pardoned two of them.  So now we know that both Democrat candidates have the bomb throwing terrorist support.This fall when the democratic bloodletting is finally (temporarily) over all we have to is run the film clips during thier campaigns. That way the 'Republican hate machine' and the 'Vast right wing conspiracy' can sit this one out because we knuckle draggers won't need them. The so call debate did confirm one thing that I and others have always thought that George Steph was a Clinton stooge. They gave him his start in politics. Now the Obamoids are saying the same thing.  I call 'em Obamoids, those True Believers in the Word according to Obama. Void of thought, they will bask in his Words without examining what, if anything, Obama is actually saying. That's why Obama will get away with "clarifying" his recent statements. At least among the Obamoids It is troublesome that so many became Obama's True Believers before checking his actual view on life and politics...explains how demogogues get away with their crimes for so long (and sometimes too late) before they wake up. This is typical thinking of the Straight Democrat voting always faithfull. Most liberals are simply "admitting" what despicable people the Clintons are now that they have some other person to latch onto-Obama. It is fun to watch the liberals validate everything we've known and said about the Clintons, though they would never admit we were right all along. Liberals claim to be the smartest people in the room but have been willing to have their intelligence insulted continuously by the Clintons. Having to swallow that the Clintons have a real marriage. Having to swallow that it was simply a VRWC bringing up false stories like Monica-swallow pun unintended! Having to swallow that Monica was a one time transgression in the White House and that there were no other victims. And liberals poke fun at the blind faith displayed by the religious-WOW! .TRIPLE CROWN WINNER I wouldn't vote for Hillary. To a liberal that makes me a a mysogynist. I wouldn't vote for Obama. To a liberal that makes me a racist. Oh yeah, I wouldn't vote for Barney Frank. To a liberal that makes me a homophobe. I win the trifecta Roy Mark     "Faith is believing what you know ain't so" Mark Twain...  Whatever you do don't vote for McBush. We don't need another Republican president. The Republcans have nothing good to say about their party so all they can do is bash Democrats. Liberal is not a dirty word and neither is atheist. http://community.victoriaadvocate.com/home/Blog/marksremarks/7157/#c_45952 http://community.victoriaadvocate.com/home/Blog/marksremarks/7157/#c_45952 "Faith is believing what you know ain't so" Mark Twain...  Whatever you do don't vote for McBush. We don't need another Republican president. The Republcans have nothing good to say about their party so all they can do is bash Democrats. Liberal is not a dirty word and neither is atheist.   ROY MARK WRITES There is an old Southern saying  "Faith sets a poor table" Faith must be the only thing that sustains the Democrats beliefs in Obama. I have asked this question several times but so far  I have  not received any answers to this question. WHAT DID OBAMA DO IN HIS LIFE TO DESERVE TO BE THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES?   Roy Mark signs his messages http://community.victoriaadvocate.com/home/Blog/marksremarks/7157/#c_45976 http://community.victoriaadvocate.com/home/Blog/marksremarks/7157/#c_45976   ROY MARK WRITES There is an old Southern saying  "Faith sets a poor table" Faith must be the only thing that sustains the Democrats beliefs in Obama. I have asked this question several times but so far  I have  not received any answers to this question. WHAT DID OBAMA DO IN HIS LIFE TO DESERVE TO BE THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES?   Roy Mark signs his messages Ahh! As an Evangelical, Zionist, Spirit filled Christian I can safely say faith has indeed set a great table for me. I've had great amounts of income and no income and I've never gone hungry. No! I cannot vote for McCain! He's a war hero but then so was JFK. He's as liberal as the day is long so to tell the truth this election is a win-win for the democrats. No,there are no errors in the Bible. There is just the failure of man to comprehend it. It is so deep theologians have spent their lives studying it and yet so simple a street vagrant can grasp it's concepts. I'll vote for Alan Keyes. He tried to run as a republican when W first ran. He was forcably excluded from a televised debate and was removed by the police. If W had any integrity at all he would have walked out until Keyes was given a spot. Neither W or Obama are fit to tie Keyes shoe laces! I find that sometimes the worst examples of Christianity are those who call themselves Christians! Myself having failed in that area a few times. http://community.victoriaadvocate.com/home/Blog/marksremarks/7157/#c_46118 http://community.victoriaadvocate.com/home/Blog/marksremarks/7157/#c_46118 Ahh! As an Evangelical, Zionist, Spirit filled Christian I can safely say faith has indeed set a great table for me. I've had great amounts of income and no income and I've never gone hungry. No! I cannot vote for McCain! He's a war hero but then so was JFK. He's as liberal as the day is long so to tell the truth this election is a win-win for the democrats. No,there are no errors in the Bible. There is just the failure of man to comprehend it. It is so deep theologians have spent their lives studying it and yet so simple a street vagrant can grasp it's concepts. I'll vote for Alan Keyes. He tried to run as a republican when W first ran. He was forcably excluded from a televised debate and was removed by the police. If W had any integrity at all he would have walked out until Keyes was given a spot. Neither W or Obama are fit to tie Keyes shoe laces! I find that sometimes the worst examples of Christianity are those who call themselves Christians! Myself having failed in that area a few times. Evangelical!! Alan Keys! I think I threw up a little bit! Urgh. Rent the DVD "Jesus Camp" and tell me the evangelicals are not out of their minds. Alan Keys. Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha http://community.victoriaadvocate.com/home/Blog/marksremarks/7157/#c_46131 http://community.victoriaadvocate.com/home/Blog/marksremarks/7157/#c_46131 Evangelical!! Alan Keys! I think I threw up a little bit! Urgh. Rent the DVD "Jesus Camp" and tell me the evangelicals are not out of their minds. Alan Keys. Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha Freethinker, interesting! Jesus was accused of being out of his mind, among other things, so I guess I'm in good company. Alan Keyes is a brilliant man who believes just the opposite of Bush. Do you even know who he is? http://community.victoriaadvocate.com/home/Blog/marksremarks/7157/#c_46153 http://community.victoriaadvocate.com/home/Blog/marksremarks/7157/#c_46153 Freethinker, interesting! Jesus was accused of being out of his mind, among other things, so I guess I'm in good company. Alan Keyes is a brilliant man who believes just the opposite of Bush. Do you even know who he is? Well I can appreciate he thinks the opposite of Bush but I don't think he is a brilliant man. He is unethical in my book. He paid himself 100,000 dollars per year out of his campaign funds and the denies any responsibility for debt incurred when he was running for th 1992 senate. He is all talk and no action. Even some of his campaign workers said they would not vote for him. That there were much better candidates! http://community.victoriaadvocate.com/home/Blog/marksremarks/7157/#c_46213 http://community.victoriaadvocate.com/home/Blog/marksremarks/7157/#c_46213 Well I can appreciate he thinks the opposite of Bush but I don't think he is a brilliant man. He is unethical in my book. He paid himself 100,000 dollars per year out of his campaign funds and the denies any responsibility for debt incurred when he was running for th 1992 senate. He is all talk and no action. Even some of his campaign workers said they would not vote for him. That there were much better candidates!