|
|
Are you sure you want to report the following content as a violation?
|
|
|
|
It seems that everybody is overlooking the fact that the charges brought upon Ratfcliff are no longer based solely on accusations. Regardless of the person, much less the character of the person, who brought forth these accusations Ratcliff was indicted based upon the evidence produced by an investigation. You can’t just point your finger at somebody (or stand in the town square) and accuse a person of committing a crime and expect that he or she be automatically arrested. There has to be some sort of preliminary evidence in your favor before that happens. As MichaelKnight pointed out, if the FBI/cybercrimes has been involved in this case then there is already an electronic trail of evidence that supports the accusations.
sureursmart: I’m beginning to think your handle is nothing more than your own daily affirmation. However, you are not fooling anyone. Having read your insightful quote from Webster’s Dictionary on the definition of pun, perhaps this is your way of educating...
|
|
|
|
Please check the following violations, and include anything else in the comment box. |
|
|
| Comment |
|
|
| Captcha |
|
Please enter the text from the image above
|
|
|
