|
|
Hello Mike,
Let me see it I understand your point of view here.
Your reasoning is that the government could intervene to MAKE a woman have a child, as in passing a law saying that killing a child in the womb is a crime, thus making pregnant women have the child.
I see a few ways at least to answer this. What's more draconian, having law which mandates the legality of killing children in the womb, or having a law which says that once a pregnancy has begun, that the life of the child should be respected? Sure, not all children are mandated to be killed, but then not all pregnancies would be "forced" either. I imagine some might amend the law to allow for the LIFE of the mother, but I can't see a justification for much else.
I think that much of the "choice" in the 50 million abortions came before the women got pregnant.
Secondly, I don't see how giving birth is "forced." Abortion is the artificial, forcible, premature termination of a pregnancy with the intent of killing...
|
|
