|
|
Are you sure you want to report the following content as a violation?
|
|
|
|
I have to agree that your observation is logical and well-written, Wind. It also reminds me of a grand jury proceeding. It's pretty simple to get an indictment when only one side of the story is being told. That's why an indictment is NOT a guilty verdict but simply an agreement that sufficient evidence exists to warrant an investigation of BOTH sides of the story and a trial to determine if guilt exists or if innocence can be proven.
I won't go into the alleged victim's "late breaking" story of his violation. The psychology of that situation has been discussed all over this place. Likewise the grand jury indictments. Sufficient evidence to warrant a full investigation. And the newspaper reported both the victim's story and the GJ indictments. As you said, that's their job. So there's a quandary. Does the victim remain quiet if he's afraid he can't "prove" his allegations? Or does the newspaper fail or even refuse to publish that news because they can't risk...
|
|
|
|
Please check the following violations, and include anything else in the comment box. |
|
|
| Comment |
|
|
| Captcha |
|
Please enter the text from the image above
|
|
|
